Trailer News

Was going to see it, but from all the reviews everyone said its only okay. Any reviews??
there were cool parts, and there were parts that were absolutely horrendous. if you see it in a theater people will LOL at the horrendous parts, and it will be enjoyable throughout. imo there was too much Peter Parker prancing around and too much silly drama that made little sense, and there was definitely not enough venom wrecking people’s shit and being a badass. if the sandman wasnt in the movie, i wouldnt have missed him.

i agree with everything except the comment about sandman. i thought whats his face was excellent casting and thought he did the best acting of all the actors so far in all 3 flicks. i was really skeptical about sandman being any good, but i thought they pulled it off well. venom on the other hand…there was some cool stuff, but i was hoping for a lot more.

he’s a good actor, but his role in the movie was weak. with him out of the movie, there woulda been more room for venom to be developed. and then they could have used sandman in spiderman 4, or something. there were these 2 stories going on at the same time but neither story was given enough time on the screen to make much sense. thing is, people went to this movie to see one thing: venom. so, people are disappointed.
spiderman 3 was a set up for Lizard and Carnage for the next movie

Conners has the symbiote and will turn into the Lizard

remember that other metoer with symbiote that fell? i think that can lead to Carnage

but it doesnt follow the cartoon because eddie brock is suppose to eb captured and put into jail and casedy turns into carnage UNLESS there’s a pleasant surprised and venom survived somehow. who knows.

i also heard about the Black Cat might be featured in the next film
Only OK, and the audience was bored at my theatre.

I think Tobey wanted to showcase his acting. Notice how often he fought w/o his hood.
I’m going against the norm here, but I actually liked it. It didnt stick to the comics, at all, but neither did the other movies. I really like the sandman’s character, and thought they fit him in well. My only gripe was I do wish they had more venom in it.

All in all, I’d see it again on dvd.
I wasnt impressed. If carnage is in the next movie i’ll give up on the franchise. Venom is borderline, but carnage is everything bad about comics
I liked it. Some things bothered me though like Peter Parkers stupid emo haircut, they barely developed Eddie Brock/Venom’s character, and how they barely explained the symbiote.

Bruce Campbells part was awesome though =]
Can hardly believe all the critics in here, i saw it yesterday and absolutely loved it! 3 was better then 1 + 2 together, the action scenes where put together in a very profound manner, it was absolutely great how they went from into a quiet moment with peter walking down the street, suddenly gets attacked and has to fight for his life with harry, those narrow scenes and camera movements were great action up till the point where harry knocks his head to this tube.

The Sandman for this version was absolutely fantastic, the moment i saw this escaped convict running in the dark i was like ‘omg that looks like the sandman’ , really the comic book lovers shouldn’t be dissapointed because the movie outbeats the story line in the strips by far, the transformation of this guy into this sandfreak was for me really a period that was missing in the comic books, where you’d always had the feeling the sandman was always there, the cooperation of venom and the sandman vs spiderman and the hobgoblin was great too, especially the counter attacks of the hobgoblin against the sandman where amazing, the death of harry, the moments of romance, and life questions with the typical new york attitude in the surrounding city made this the best spiderman movie i’ve ever seen.

Its almost asif you people stepped into the wrong theatre watching it, i feel sad for you guys that you didn’t enjoy it, but i really had the time of my life seeing it.
What the FUCK was that dancing shit? Possibly some of the gayest shit I’ve seen in a movie.

The action scenes weren’t bad, but emo Parker kind of ruined the movie.

By far the worst of the 3.

The way they handled Parker ‘changing’ was horribly done. I’d honesty like to see if in the comics he was acting like a complete faggot doing the ‘finger as guns’ motion towards the women walking past him on the street and randomly breaking out into dance. I didn’t pay 8 bucks to see fucking West Side Story.

hahahhha you’re an idiot in all aspects of your life

I went in with no expectations at all and came out dissapointed

Not if i compare it to the aspects of your life, you who put yourself on a pedestal thinking your so high and mighty isn’t a justification to insult or harrass other people. You don’t even know any of the aspects of my life, nor would you care for them,so why should anyone willingly listen to you?

Seriously jimmy you lose everytime backpedalling yourself into darkness when your just out to get people, i don’t know how long it takes when you will understand. Hopefully before you get banned.

I didn’t really mind it because he was being portrayed as the "student" type of guy , so even when being more agressive this attitude of social inadequacy came forward pretty strong was only to be expected. Peter Parker is a person who balances between being a nobody behind the scenes, to a somebody as spiderman on the big screen. So in that perspective i don’t feel its misplaced.

For me the bad moment was more when mary Jane was having cooking lessons with Harry, i felt like id paid 8 bucks to watch jamie oliver doing a flipover with a pancake. I felt like i was being robbed from my money lol.

my life is fantastic. go back to your fasting and repenting and pacifist self-loathing, but dont you dare glorify shitty movies.

You have no slack space its not asif 100% perfect movies are ever going to be broadcasted, so chill out and get the hell out of your negative solitairy attitude in which you pretend that your life is great, rather repent and fast while you glorify and hail this wonderfull spiderman 3 movie along with me. I mean c’mon , it wasn’t that bad. Didn’t you even like the sandman? They did a great character on him, and that guy turning into venom and him into the sandman was well done too,there was great action in it and honestly if this was a bad movie towards you you might do good in lowering your standards, i’d like to hear what you’d consider as a good movie, maby diehard4 , which im bound to go see too.

i dont even know what the hell you’re babbling on about anymore, but for the sake of bringing in a different perspective lets see what Rotten Tomatoes had to say about spiderman 3 compared to the last two.

Spiderman: 90%

Spiderman 2: 93%

Spiderman 3: 61%

if you read my posts here you’d have seen where i said

so obviously there were things i liked about it. i liked it if only for the sheer fact that venom was on the screen. but was it a gem? hell fucking NO. and was it better than either of the other two spiderman movies? hell. no. was it better than both the other movies combined? you’ve got to be retarded to think so.
Rotton tomatoes has rotton opinions anyway, and if you look at the reviews they go ‘ i really liked it ‘ but on grading they still give low rates, and what gives? Spiderman 1 was just a hobgoblin fest, while Spiderman 2 just made you go into the cradle of the octopus, the action scenes in Spiderman 3 where top notch compared to the first 2, the overal atmosphere was better, and the villan with hero, villan and villan teamwork made this movie all the more interesting, because Spiderman got an ally out of an unexpected corner, you didn’t had any of those kind of events in the first 2, Spiderman 2 was far more boring, and Spiderman 1 had to occupy itself purely with building up the story around Peter Parker, because the story build up is done and over with around Peter Parker itself, we can see Spiderman being able to come in action in full glory against the Villans. The only thing with the critics is that the movie goes so fast, most people can’t follow the story line, and its impossible to demand they can squeeze years of comic book story line within a 140 min time frame, im damn happy that if not that it didn’t follow the story line, because this movie outbeats the story line in the comic books by far, therefore this dissapointment is unwarrented, and because the overal lackings that where present in Spiderman 1 and 2 where filled up in Spiderman 3 makes it not at all so strange at all for people to say that this movie outbeats the previous 2 versions of Spiderman.
holy fuck your opinions suck. i wish i could add you to my ignore list.

and it wasnt the hobgoblin in the first movie. it was the green goblin.
maybe you’ll notice a striking resemblance between these two:

(for starters, they’re both green)
My opinions stand as they are, look if you do a google search you’ll see that if you type green goblin, both the hobgoblin and the green goblin will appear, so in other words ‘they are the same’ hence the confusion because both son and dad who play the part of the goblin are in the movie.

just stop talking. you’re an idiot and you know it.

maybe you’ll notice a striking resemblance between these two:

Its not worthy to give it a different name, its still the hobgoblin Its the same thing just with a different color, and maby without the cape. And it outlines wonderfully that the spiderman comic books lacked creativity compared to the Spiderman 3 movie.

Lets talk some more , i already outlined before that these things are not a justification to insult or harrass other people , your insults are misplaced, and your self proclaimed immortality will be your downfall.

are you still being serious about this? they have different character designs and different titles. just stop.

did you really just say that the spiderman comics lacked creativity compared to the 3rd movie? holy bajesus, your opinions are worse every time you give one.

you DO know that i’m an atheist, and i never claimed to have any sort of immortality. what the hell are you talking about?

I’ve been reading your posts, and I think I know what you are.

You’re a 15 or 16 year old kid, who watched the Spiderman cartoon while eating your morning breakfast, and played with the action figures, making up your own origin stories for them. You watched the movies, only half aware that there was a REAL Spiderman comic, and you hit offtopic, at the age of 9, and heard ALL about Spiderman from other offtopicers.

Watching this third movie, you thought it was great, wild and inventive because you were "wowed" so much by the graphics, you ignored the horrible, horrible plot of the movie, how it tries to mish-mash a plotline going on since the first movie, include fan-favorite Venom, and for some odd reason Sandman as well.

You have no taste, no brains, no…third thing.

Notes:
-In the comic book, Harry and Norman were both Green Goblins, Hobgoblin was always some 3rd guy, so I don’t think you know that element at all from the comics.
-You’re a stupid faggot.
-The third movie wasn’t more creative, it was dumber.
-Take your Ritalin so the first two movies won’t seem so slow paced.
-God i want your hot creamy cum inside my asshole. I want you to pound me while you talk about the finer points of Ishtar. I want you to tell me all about the mise en scene of Norbit, and how Eddie Murphy’s acting style reflects on Carl Jung’s "Duality of Man". I want you to finish up inside my mouth and tell me I’m a better actor than Jamie Kennedy. God I want you.

Look, you can give yourself a different avatar and call yourself sjimmy but your still the same person, the same counts for this hobgoblin character,the small changes don’t add up to an entire new character its the green goblin with a paint job,that’s why the movie is better designed then the comics, so no matter whether you say hobgoblin or green goblin its practically the same thing, and you make yourself immortal in terms of ignorance towards those simularities. Im actually suprised that you could fall so hard over such a small amount of detail change, that i bet you won’t even recognize your own mother if she changed the dye of her hair.

Yeah i know im too mature for my age, and i tell you this movie is greater then the comic books for several reasons, it doesn’t have a lot of confusing characters like the comic books, the whole plot on to discover who was the real hobgoblin took way to many years, to create look alike characters like the green goblin was a cheaper then cheap move from the comic books so i don’t even bother giving these characters a different name, you should ignore the long paced story line on what happend in the comic books and replace it by the superiour story line that took place in the movie, you are just simply waaaay to conservative, which makes you unable to appreciate these wonderfull spiderman movies, it doesn’t take half a brain to recognise this, so why you can’t understand it is beyond me.

I wasn’t sure what you meant with

But im sure jimeigh will volenteer.

NO.

and you meant to say than*

your analogies are staggeringly stupid, and your grasp of simple concepts is amazingly weak.
the only way Spiderman 3 would have been better than the comics is if it ended with the ending it was supposed to have.

i’m speaking of course about a scene that follows up the very eerily homoerotic conversation between the butler and Harry, where the butler tells Harry, "i loved your father, just like i love you."

the scene would have them both ass-naked in the green gas chamber, taking turns fucking each other in the asshole. afterwards, the chamber floor would be covered in bloody shit, so they roll around in it and pee on each other with horrible aim. the movie ends after the two blast sticky loads of soldiers all over each other’s faces in the 69 position as the ghost of Harry’s father cheers them on.
Probably spoilers here.

Downright horrible. Horrible to the point where I don’t even think they bothered trying to make the script make sense, they just threw random crap at the page and shot it. Several scenes are hard to watch because they’re so stupid, and at the same time serve NO PURPOSE in advancing the film. Bad acting by Tobey McGuire and whoever the chick playing MJ is (Kursten Dunst or something)? Neither can act that well, Tobey seems to have Zoolander Syndrome and only has 1 facial expression, MJ simply sucked ass at her part. And the storyline made no sense at all.

Harry convinces MJ to dump Peter, but MJ doesn’t just say "Hey Peter, go kick that guys ass."
A METEROITE from SPACE lands 30 FEET from spiderman and his spidey sense doesn’t go off?
A goblin bomb 1 foot from Harrys head causes minorish burns on his face, but that same 1 bomb completely destroys Venom?
Apparently Venom now adds to list of common side effects Emo Haircut/Makeup (I hate to use that word but none other is as descriptive, seriously he dresses just like a scene kid), excessive West Side Story renditions and Pelvic Thrusts.

Other crap I can’t remember. Neither sandman nor venoms stories were really delved into, the fact that they wrote-in sandman as the villian from spidey 1 was pretty ridiculous, etc. Really too many things to write down that I disliked about the movie, and whoever was in charge FUCKED up, because the 1st/second ones weren’t nearly as bad.

However, the CGI was good. The problem is, 10 minutes of CGI fighting in a 3 hour movie doesn’t cut it.

you should read Darketernal’s posts here, that kid is a fucking riot.

in for alternate ending

I saw them, he is the kind of poster where he’s only going to agree with supporters and flame people who disagree with his point of view, so adressing him isn’t a priority.

Another thing. SUPER HEROES WEAR MASKS FOR A REASON. Why was his mask off in nearly every scene in the movie where he has a suit on? I know media people, they fucking HUNT for stories, and spiderman is absolutely the biggest thing in that town, someone would have got a pic every time it came off. Which was at least 10 times.

Just massive, massive plotholes in that movie, that I can’t imagine letting slip if I was reading a script.

You’ve never read the comics.

I stroke myself while I think of how much time you dedicated to answering me. I take one stroke along my shaft, rhythmically, to the syllables of your mouth-words. You complete me.

one of the worst parts of the movie is when he’s doing those faggoty finger as guns shit. i was like thinking wtf during the entire emo parker plotline.
I thought the movie was alright. Nothing I’d watch again.
I’d go with whoever says it was okay. Too many people are saying that its going too far away from the comics, and I think they might be expecting too much. The fighting scenes were great, but the drama and "emo Parker" were so unnecessary, especially the dance scene. If they had fixed that, and made more use of the suit being badass on Parker, the movie would’ve been a lot better. My girlfriend asked me to see it with her a second time (first for her), but I didn’t wanna have to sit through the first half. Venom was done really well though, at least in my opinion.

here’s my main problem with the movie. There was absolutely NO reason to introduce Gwen Stacey unless spiderman was going to kill her. They’ve already made the whole spiderman and mary jane dynamic the romantic focus of the series, i completely disagreed with introducing mary jane so early and I’m sure they realize that was a mistake, noone wanted to see spiderman and mary jane right off the bat. Spiderman killing Gwen Stacey might be one of the most important events to ever happen in comic book history and they should have focused on that early or left it out completely. To drop her into the story 3 movies in AFTER peter parker and mary jane are "on again, off again" is ridiculous
It was ok, they tried to cram way too much into the movie though. Specials effects are awesome.

That and I’ve never seen spiderman cried so much, lol. Also the part at the bar was pretty emo. I thought the movie was very disappointing. Doesn’t even come close to Spiderman I and II

correct.

dumbeternal, take notes.
I thought it was alright, a few things bothered me that were already previously mentioned so I wont mention them again.

I might have missed it, but did Venom stick out his tongue at all?
I didn’t like Spiderman 1 or 2 so my opinion might not be worth much, but no one in the movie can act. It was very dull and emotionless. The special effects were cool and maybe if it had been muted it would have been okay.

no, he didnt
Before the movie starts they put this Huge MARVEL image into the screen, so if the guys from Marvel approve of it, then the people who watch this movie should swallow it as it comes and take note that if they dissaprove of this movie, they should have had a better corresponding feedback to the designer guys of this marvelous Spiderman 3 movie before its being brought out.

The next question of course is how much storyline can you cram into a few minutes. If you take note that a comic line goes on for years, its only natural and logical that they can’t jam that into such a short time frame, people who read the comics should give the movie makers some slack space and take that limited time frame in aspect and put this movie into its context. I think it alright to seperate the comic story line from the movie story line. Especially if it outbeats the boring story lines from the comics which often take far too long, especially the hobgoblin saga in the comic books took too long, don’t you agree?

Im definitly going to watch Spiderman 4 , although its going to be hard to surpass this previous movie, im sure they will do a good job.

oh i see your logic darketernal. since Marvel knew that this movie, good or bad, was going to MAKE THEM MONEY, we should eat it all the fuck up and love it. you idiot, stop having opinions because they always suck. you’re like those idiots who insist that a pair of pants is great merely because they were made by some fancypants company which has already made a name for itself.

the first two movies did a pretty good job. the fact is that they tried to fit too much in the third movie which was a bad idea.

which is why they should pick and choose the piece of the comic book they want to use, instead of take a whole shitload of it and make a bad movie.

you’re fat

i’ll watch spiderman 4 too. it wont be hard to be better than the third movie, but it’ll probably such worse because the bar has just been lowered, and people like you eat it up anyhow.
Its nice to see we think in the same way about this movie, however i can honestly say im not fat, those pants you mentioned earlier fit just nicely. You know people who do namecalling like idiot,etc often have a lack of self-esteem. They are usually atheists who don’t realize that in the short period they live on this planet they would be better off being nice to others instead of causing a flamewar. Which makes me think, id be wondering if the Next Spiderman 4 movie will be about the hidden wars, and maby some backtracking on the fantastic four and spidermans consulting with dr.Reed + on how that symbiote reached the earth. In terms of storyline i think its much easier however to introduce Scorpion and mysterio, and maby even that rhino man, but i never was such a fan of those characters.

I think the most amazing suprise to me could be if the beyonder would step into the spiderman 4 movie.

oh holy hell i hope they DONT do that

My name is Kalypso, and that’s fucking funny
saw this yesterday with a small group of 10-12 year old kids (who all adore the first two)

they all thought it was *meh* the 12 close to 13 year olds thought the dancing bit was odd and didn’t appreciate the soap-operish drama between spidey and gwen and mary jane

I tend to agree. Some of the special efffects were cool but i felt that there were gaps and as others have said, simply too much of little details and plot items that didn’t really matter in the long run.

This one probably will keep us from the theatre for #4, we’ll see it but will wait for the DVD unless it’s a lot better.

I doubt we’ll get #3 on DVD. But we’ll continue to watch 1 and 2 – bothe exciting and entertaining.

i sent my suggestion to the people who made this:

I didn’t particularly like this movie. The only two things I liked about it was 1. Bruce Campbell 2. Venom’s look

Everything else felt cluttered and too much was going on at once to the point where character focus or development was hopeless. The Sandman’s potential villainy was also ruined in a lot of ways, including his origin.
Saw this for the first time a couple of weeks ago. It was okay but it could of been much better. I didnt really care for the "bad" Peter Parker.

likewise, that scene in the jazz club was lame.

Overall, i didnt like the movie either. It just seemed to drag on and on…
the movie is okey, in my opinion you can rent it on DVD and wouldn’t miss a thing. the acting wasn’t all that, and i guess you can say the real star of the movie is the special effects…

J
sutree.com

Related posts:

1. spiderman 3
2. New Spiderman 3 Trailer
3. spidey 3 clip from heroes….
4. Watch Spiderman 3 , Shrek 3 Online FREE
5. Out of these movies coming out, which are you the most excited to see?

November 26th, 2008
Categories: general .

No Comments

No comments yet.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a comment